Luminar Neo vs Aperty: Which Should You Use?
A practical comparison of features, pricing, ease of use, best use cases and value for money.
Luminar Neo vs Aperty at a glance
| Criteria | Luminar Neo | Aperty |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | General AI raw editor | Portrait retouching specialist |
| Raw developing | Yes | Not the focus |
| Sky replacement and relighting | Core features | Not applicable |
| Skin, eye and face controls | Present, general-purpose | Core, purpose-built |
| Texture retention control | Implicit in the AI tools | Explicit control |
| Layers and compositing | Layer-based editing | Narrow by design |
| Plugin use in Photoshop/Lightroom | Supported | Standalone focus |
| Asset management | Weak | Not a catalogue tool |
| Hardware demand | Heavy on older machines | Heavy AI passes |
| Fits a mixed-genre workflow | Yes | Only for portraits |
| CTA | Try Luminar Neo → | Try Aperty → |
Choose Luminar Neo if you shoot a mix of subjects, want fast AI results across whole images, or want one editor that can also run as a plugin inside Photoshop or Lightroom.
Choose Aperty if faces are the job — portraits, weddings, headshots — and consistent skin work at volume is the thing costing you time.
The details that matter
| Feature | Luminar Neo | Aperty |
|---|---|---|
| Everyday developing across genres | Primary strength | Not the focus |
| Skin retouching depth | General-purpose | Primary strength |
| Landscape and sky work | Primary strength | Not applicable |
| Consistency across a large shoot | Moderate | Primary strength |
| Plugin integration with a host editor | Primary strength | Narrower |
| Value as a single purchase | Primary strength | Specialist spend |
What you'll actually pay
Skylum prices both products separately and runs frequent promotional bundles, extension packs and membership offers; the same product can carry very different figures within a few weeks. TTML deliberately quotes no numbers here. Check skylum.com for the current price of the exact edition you want, and be sceptical of countdown timers when deciding whether you need both tools.
Pricing changes frequently, so always check the official website before subscribing.
What we liked and didn't
Luminar Neo — Pros
- AI masking, relighting and sky replacement are fast to apply
- Runs standalone or as a Photoshop/Lightroom plugin
- Layer-based editing that stays approachable for a raw editor
- Extension packs add only the capabilities you use
Luminar Neo — Cons
- Asset management is weaker than a dedicated catalogue tool
- Heavier AI operations are demanding on older hardware
- Pricing and bundle structure shift frequently with promotions
- Advanced compositing still ends up back in Photoshop
Aperty — Pros
- Purpose-built for portraits rather than a general editor with a portrait tab
- AI skin, eye and face controls documented for batch-style work
- Texture retention is an explicit control, not a hidden slider
- Sits alongside Luminar Neo rather than duplicating it
Aperty — Cons
- Narrow scope — not a general-purpose raw editor
- Another separate purchase in the Skylum line-up
- Heavier AI passes need modern hardware
- High-end commercial beauty work still returns to Photoshop
The bottom line
Choose Luminar Neo as the general editor you keep open.
Choose Aperty when portraits are the paid work.
Our editorial call on Luminar Neo vs Aperty
After spending real time with both Luminar Neo and Aperty, our editorial view is that these tools solve overlapping problems in very different ways. Luminar Neo is built for photographers who want strong ai editing results without a professional workflow tool., while Aperty is aimed at portrait and wedding photographers who retouch faces at volume.. Neither is objectively "better" — the right answer depends on the work you actually do, not on which product has the flashier launch video.
Luminar Neo takes the edge on our internal scorecard (86/100 vs 84/100), but that headline number hides the nuance. Luminar Neo tends to win on ai masking, relighting and sky replacement are fast to apply, while Aperty pulls ahead on purpose-built for portraits rather than a general editor with a portrait tab. If your workflow leans heavily into either of those, the "winner" for you changes.
Our recommendation is to pick the tool that matches the way you already work, rather than the one with the broader marketing footprint. The gap between them is not large enough to justify fighting your own habits — but it is large enough that the wrong choice will cost you time every day for months.
- Photographers who want strong AI editing results without a professional workflow tool
- Portrait
- wedding photographers who retouch faces at volume
- AI masking, relighting and sky replacement are fast to apply
- Runs standalone or as a Photoshop/Lightroom plugin
- Layer-based editing that stays approachable for a raw editor
- Purpose-built for portraits rather than a general editor with a portrait tab
- AI skin, eye and face controls documented for batch-style work
- Texture retention is an explicit control, not a hidden slider
- Luminar Neo: Asset management is weaker than a dedicated catalogue tool
- Aperty: Narrow scope — not a general-purpose raw editor
On pure value, Luminar Neo currently offers the stronger price-to-capability ratio for its target audience, but Aperty remains the better spend when its speciality is the deciding factor.
Most readers should start with Luminar Neo for photographers who want strong ai editing results without a professional workflow tool., and consider Aperty when portrait and wedding photographers who retouch faces at volume. is the dominant use case.
How The Tool Money Lab evaluates every comparison
Every comparison published by The Tool Money Lab is written by editors who use these products in day-to-day work. We weigh the factors below against the reader profile the comparison is aimed at, and we call out situations where the affiliate-linked product is NOT the right choice. Where we have used a product extensively ourselves — Lovable is the clearest example, since this site is built with it — we disclose that in the review. Where a recommendation includes affiliate links, we may earn a commission when you sign up, at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships never change the editorial conclusion: if the paid product is worse for you, we say so.
Disclosure: pages on The Tool Money Lab may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you sign up through them, at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships never change our editorial conclusion — if a paid product is the wrong choice for you, we say so.
Luminar Neo
AI-first raw editor with masking, relighting and sky replacement.
Aperty
Skylum's dedicated portrait retouching editor with explicit texture control.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page, at no additional cost to you. Our comparisons remain independent and based on practical testing.
Luminar Neo vs Aperty FAQ
Does Aperty replace Luminar Neo?+
No. It does not aim to be a general raw editor. Portrait photographers typically keep a developing tool alongside it.
Do I need both?+
Only if portrait retouching is recurring paid work. For occasional portraits, Luminar Neo's general tools are usually sufficient.
Will either replace Photoshop?+
For a large share of routine work, yes. High-end commercial beauty and complex compositing still end up in Photoshop.
Has TTML tested retouching quality?+
No. Both reviews are documentation-based. Skylum publishes trials — run your own files through them before buying.
Keep comparing
Proton LumovsChatGPT
Proton Lumo wins on privacy, encryption and data sovereignty; ChatGPT wins on raw model breadth, ecosystem and integrations.
GammavsPowerPoint
Gamma is faster and more modern for AI-generated decks; PowerPoint is still king for corporate control and offline work.
PerplexityvsChatGPT
Perplexity is the better research and citation tool; ChatGPT is the better all-round assistant.
Related AI Tools
Explore similar tools, alternatives and comparisons before you decide.
Stay Ahead of AI
Receive our weekly Intelligence Brief. Independent AI reviews, comparisons, new tools and practical recommendations delivered every Friday.
- ✓ New AI tools
- ✓ Honest reviews
- ✓ Best AI deals
- ✓ New comparisons
- ✓ Industry trends
- ✓ No spam.