CyberSuite vs Detectify
Detectify and CyberSuite overlap on continuous external testing, but they are bought by different people: application security engineers versus SMB owners and managed IT providers.
Detectify is positioned as external attack-surface management and application scanning built on crowdsourced researcher findings. Penetration testing, dark web monitoring and security awareness training sold as one SMB subscription instead of a consulting engagement.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you purchase through links on this page. This never affects our reviews.
CyberSuite vs Detectify at a glance
| Criterion | CyberSuite | Detectify |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $0 (Pro $199/mo) | Quoted by attack surface size |
| Target customer | SMBs and MSPs that need continuous penetration testing evidence for compliance without retaining a security firm. | Application and product security teams that need continuous external attack-surface monitoring across a large domain footprint. |
| Deployment | Cloud portal (SaaS). CyberSuite provisions the environment and whitelists customer IPs for portal access. | Hosted SaaS platform; testing runs from Detectify's infrastructure against assets the customer verifies they own. No documented on-premise deployment and no internal network testing. |
| Continuous testing | Real-time 24/7 testing on up to five targets on Pro, combining an automated engine with manual penetration testing, plus unlimited retesting. | Continuous external attack-surface monitoring across domains and subdomains, with configurable application scanning including authenticated scans. Test modules are derived in part from the Crowdsource ethical hacker programme. |
| Compliance | Documentation positions reports as supporting evidence for PCI, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO and NIST — evidence, not certification. | Output is used as supporting evidence in assurance work; we do not attribute specific framework certifications we cannot source from current official documentation. |
| Reporting | Downloadable PDF reports with findings exportable as CSV, plus in-portal remediation guidance and posture charts. | Findings with severity context and remediation guidance in-platform, plus API access for pulling asset and finding data into your own tooling. |
- Best for
- SMBs and MSPs that need continuous penetration testing evidence for compliance without retaining a security firm.
- Starting price
- From $0 (Pro $199/mo)
- Business size
- Pending editorial review
- Deployment
- Cloud portal (SaaS). CyberSuite provisions the environment and whitelists customer IPs for portal access.
- Free trial
- Not confirmed
- TTML review
- Read the CyberSuite review
- Best for
- Application and product security teams that need continuous external attack-surface monitoring across a large domain footprint.
- Starting price
- Quoted by attack surface size
- Business size
- Pending editorial review
- Deployment
- Hosted SaaS platform; testing runs from Detectify's infrastructure against assets the customer verifies they own. No documented on-premise deployment and no internal network testing.
- Free trial
- Yes
- TTML review
- Read the Detectify review
Prices, audience and trial availability are taken from each vendor's published documentation and our own review where one exists.
- Continuous PTaaS with unlimited retesting rather than a point-in-time engagement
- Combines AI-driven and manual penetration testing in one subscription
- Dark web monitoring and security awareness training included from the Pro tier
- PDF reports and CSV findings in the format auditors and procurement actually request
- MSP tenant portal for managing multiple client environments from one account
- A genuine $0 tier and a one-time $799 licence for single-report requirements
- Crowdsource researcher network feeds real-world techniques into the automated test library
- Attack-surface discovery is a first-class product, not a bolt-on
- Detects subdomain takeover conditions and forgotten or misconfigured hosts
- Authenticated application scanning goes deeper than an unauthenticated crawl
- API access for pulling findings and asset data into your own tooling
- Five included targets before per-target add-ons limits larger estates
- Not a substitute for a deeply scoped engagement against bespoke applications
- Reports support compliance frameworks but certify nothing on their own
- Onboarding is analyst-provisioned rather than instant self-serve
- Module catalogue is still short — several modules are described as in development
- Specialist scope — no endpoint, awareness training or dark web modules
- External focus only; internal network validation needs a different tool
- Commercial packaging has changed over time, making budgeting harder
- Over-specified for a business with a single website
- Researcher-derived automation is still automation, not a scoped manual engagement
Both platforms are credible in their lane. Choose the subscription when you need continuous testing evidence on a fixed SMB budget, and the specialist when its speciality is the deciding factor for your estate.
Our reviews are based on vendor documentation, publicly available product information, independent testing where available, and ongoing editorial updates. We do not sell rankings. Where a page carries affiliate links we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you, and that relationship never changes the conclusion — see our affiliate disclosure and review methodology.
- Last reviewed
- Reviewed by
- The Tool Money Lab Editorial Team — independent software research
- Evidence sources
- Vendor Documentation · Official Pricing · Official Features · Official Security Pages
- What Is External Attack Surface Management (EASM)? — Discovery is the hard part of external security. EASM finds the internet-facing assets nobody wrote down, then keeps watching them as they change.
- Vulnerability Assessment vs Penetration Testing — A scanner tells you what looks wrong. A penetration test tells you what an attacker could actually do with it. Auditors and buyers routinely conflate the two.